Skip to main content
Polymarket
Reports a direct Polygon pUSD transfer for verification and crediting. The source wallet must sign the deposit intent. Notional derives the recipient, source, asset, amount, and finality from the transaction and its receipt.

Endpoint

Request Body

action

There is no request nonce or expiresAfter. Do not supply a user address, token, amount, or other extra fields; the request schema is strict. logIndex is an optional compatibility hint and does not select which transfer receives credit.

Signing and Submission

Use the actual deposit recipient shown by Notional’s deposit instructions for the selected deployment. The recipient is part of the signing domain; it is not the pUSD token contract or the user’s address. With a connected Viem walletClient for the source wallet:
Use "testnet" for the testnet deployment. The EIP-712 domain has name NotionalPolymarketDeposit, version 1, Polygon chain ID 137, the deposit recipient as verifyingContract, and a deployment-specific salt. Use the shared builder to construct it. The message contains only transactionHash: bytes32.

Eligible Transfers

The proof must establish a successful ordinary pUSD ERC-20 transfer from the signing user to the configured deposit recipient, with a positive amount and no unsupported additional effects. Bridge transfers, contract-wallet flows, and protocol-managed transfers cannot be claimed through this ordinary-transfer format. Approved API wallets cannot claim a new deposit for their owner. The receipt must be finalized and canonically included. Reporting a hash alone never credits an unverified amount.

Response

committed means the deposit credit was recorded. amount is decimal pUSD in ledger units, logIndex identifies the verified receipt log, and userAddress is the credited source address. Refresh assets to read the pUSD balance. An exact already-credited deposit returns success with alreadyProcessed: true; it does not credit funds twice. Check this flag before displaying a new-deposit notification.

Errors

A validly encoded but invalid deposit signature is an eligibility failure (422), rather than a successful deposit report.